http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible Interaction with RFID and NFC Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:24:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31897 Touch: Immaterials: the ghost in the field « (syn)thetic Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:54:24 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31897 [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...] [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31866 Import/Export « Twisted by Advertising Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:14:02 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31866 [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...] [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31812 links for 2010-01-15 « Sameer Padania Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:05:02 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31812 [...] Making radio tangible Timo Arnall: "here is a quick summary of existing work on radio, sensors and space that I’ve been compiling for a while." (tags: radio sensors interaction visualization ubicomp design research) [...] [...] Making radio tangible Timo Arnall: "here is a quick summary of existing work on radio, sensors and space that I’ve been compiling for a while." (tags: radio sensors interaction visualization ubicomp design research) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31736 www.nearfield.org « Twisted by Advertising Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:51:08 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31736 [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...] [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31722 Rendre les ondes radio tangibles « LocalLab : Foire aux Infos Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:34:51 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31722 [...] de publier leur prototype, Timo Arnall a dressé une très intéressante liste des réflexions et des expérimentations du même type, comme les projets en liens avec les ondes [...] [...] de publier leur prototype, Timo Arnall a dressé une très intéressante liste des réflexions et des expérimentations du même type, comme les projets en liens avec les ondes [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31702 Touch: Immaterials: the ghost in the field Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:03:16 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31702 [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...] [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31660 Immaterials: the ghost in the field Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:06:20 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31660 [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...] [...] RFID is still badly understood as an interactive technology. Many aspects of RFID interaction are fundamentally invisible; as users we experience two objects communicating through the ‘magic’ of radio waves. This invisibility is also key to the controversial aspects of RFID technology; once RFID antennas are hidden inside products or in environments, they can be invoked or initiated without explicit knowledge or permission. (See here for more on the invisibility of radio.) [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31657 Tweets that mention Making radio tangible -- Topsy.com Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:27:24 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31657 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by rollermt and Paper Plane. Paper Plane said: Making radio tangible: Fictional radio-spaces In spring 2007 interaction design students at AHO participated in.. http://bit.ly/3vyn6K [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by rollermt and Paper Plane. Paper Plane said: Making radio tangible: Fictional radio-spaces In spring 2007 interaction design students at AHO participated in.. http://bit.ly/3vyn6K [...]

]]> http://www.nearfield.org/2009/10/making-radio-tangible/comment-page-1#comment-31656 20091010 - Adam Crowe Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:34:33 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/?p=1021#comment-31656 [...] Nearfield — Making radio tangible  Roundup of projects exploring radio field interaction. Quoting Dunne & Raby: “It might seem strange to write about radio, a long-established medium, when discussion today centres on cyberspace, virtual reality, networks, smart materials and other electronic tehcnologies. But radio, meaning part of the electromagnetic spectrum is fundamental to electronics. Objects not only “dematerialise” into software in response to minituarisation and replacement by services but literally dematerialise into radiation. All electronic products are hybrids of radiation and matter. [...] Whereas cyberspace is a metaphor that spatialises what happens in computers distributed around the world, radio space is actual and physical, even though our senses detect only a tiny part of it.” Dunne&Raby wifi RFID bluetooth radio electromagnetism networks designnoir design interaction [...] [...] Nearfield — Making radio tangible  Roundup of projects exploring radio field interaction. Quoting Dunne & Raby: “It might seem strange to write about radio, a long-established medium, when discussion today centres on cyberspace, virtual reality, networks, smart materials and other electronic tehcnologies. But radio, meaning part of the electromagnetic spectrum is fundamental to electronics. Objects not only “dematerialise” into software in response to minituarisation and replacement by services but literally dematerialise into radiation. All electronic products are hybrids of radiation and matter. [...] Whereas cyberspace is a metaphor that spatialises what happens in computers distributed around the world, radio space is actual and physical, even though our senses detect only a tiny part of it.” Dunne&Raby wifi RFID bluetooth radio electromagnetism networks designnoir design interaction [...]

]]>