Comments on: Touch project interview http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview Interaction with RFID and NFC Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Touch network building / Touch http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview/comment-page-1#comment-36 Touch network building / Touch Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:16:11 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview#comment-36 [...] For those interested in the intentions of the project, have a look at this recent interview about Touch. [...] [...] For those interested in the intentions of the project, have a look at this recent interview about Touch. [...]

]]> By: Timo http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview/comment-page-1#comment-6 Timo Wed, 10 May 2006 10:52:23 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview#comment-6 Ah, thanks Janne, I meant to say 'Speedpass', which uses the EPCGlobal chip and I'm referring to RFID in general rather than just NFC, I've updated it now. Ah, thanks Janne, I meant to say ‘Speedpass’, which uses the EPCGlobal chip and I’m referring to RFID in general rather than just NFC, I’ve updated it now.

]]> By: Janne Jalkanen http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview/comment-page-1#comment-5 Janne Jalkanen Wed, 10 May 2006 10:43:27 +0000 http://www.nearfield.org/2006/05/touch-project-interview#comment-5 Nice interview, but your link referring to "hacking Paypass systems" is not correct: the article referred hacks an EPCGlobal system based tag (using 40-bit encryption, known to break using off-the-shelf hardware). It's a completely different beast. Paypass systems have not been at all, AFAIK. Nice interview, but your link referring to “hacking Paypass systems” is not correct: the article referred hacks an EPCGlobal system based tag (using 40-bit encryption, known to break using off-the-shelf hardware). It’s a completely different beast.

Paypass systems have not been at all, AFAIK.

]]>